>i'd go to /law/ and ask them what to do

facepalm

isnt thus /law/

None of it's legal. It's just highschool nigger shit.

>>6094
actually, while they are pretty much supposed to be burned, they can be accessed. they just don't show on a civvie or standard police check.

op, go file a harassment complaint against her. Even if it doesn't go anywhere, if she tries to get you in trouble the fact that you filed the charge in advance will look good for you.

to the guy that said high school nigger shit the funny thing is shes 43 and thank you all for your help

hai guise what's going on in this thread?

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/paper-trail/2009/08/05/illegal-downloading-costs-grad-student-675000.html

ouch

it is fucking awful that high profile attacks on users are only the beginning.

any ideas on how people can begin to break down this intense copyright laws like the DMC?

http://media.www.thejusticeonline.com/media/storage/paper573/news/2007/07/12/News/Two-Students.Sued.For.Illegal.Downloading-2923248.shtml

fuck the more i look the more i see it happening.

http://blogs.findlaw.com/technologist/2009/08/the-gavel-falls-in-illegal-music-downloading-trial.html

>>6126
lol he's going to file for bankruptcy and not have to pay. that's an excellent victory for the RIAA and a very stern message to all those nasty pirates.

when driving you have to prove that you are licensed to drive. you aren't required to identify yourself unless charged with a crime or look like a guy on a warrant poster. in which case, the cop doesn't give a fuck and the people at the station or jail will sort out your identity.

>>6120

>Or can you be arrested for failure to identify if you are say, walking down the street, and are asked to present a drivers liscence.

Nope. Until you're officially being detained, you do not need to "show your papers" to any officer to ascertain identity.

I know this is a strangely specific question, but if someone could at least point me in the right direction that would be great.

I'm not familiar with the specifics, but the house operates using an amended form of "Jefferson's Manual" which Thomas Jefferson wrote.

Anyway, rule 1 provides for powers and responsibilities of the speaker of the house.
clause 12 (a) provides that the speaker can force a recess if there is no question pending before the house.
idk, maybe the representative was giving a speech during the morning hour? I have no idea why the speaker pro tem (or maybe that was the clerk of the house?) would force a recess without more info...

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/hrm/browse_109.html

that links to the rules of the house in full text
should help you out.

>>6114
thanks! exactly what i was looking for!!!

so is it .0799 or .0801?

it's different from state to state
in my state you get the card on your way out (how would they mail it to homeless people?)

if your state doesn't do that, ask if you can get your card today. You probably can't get your id today. Sorry.

When I got my drivers license they gave me a little paper slip that had all the information so I could drive but I still couldn't use it in stores as ID. Thats in california and for a drivers license but I dont know what its like elsewhere for a normal ID.

i got mine asap in florida and nevada

there's a chance you will be asked to drop at any given scheduled check in.

if you really are on "low risk" you probably don't have scheduled check ins with a probation officer, so as long as you keep your head down, pay your fines, and do whatever else you're supposed to, you won't have to drop.

When you plead out you should have spoken to your PO already (to enroll and get told what to do) so you should already know how often you have to check in. They probably won't call you a lot, but if he does you should get some notice before you HAVE to report in.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Contact NORML, SAFER, and MPP.

ACLU maybe as well.

Jesus Christ, I'm sorry for your friend.

He should get a better lawyer.

How the fuck do you get caught with a joint? Why didn't he just eat it?

it's possible
most non-violent non-repetitive inmates get early release.
These are questions your family/brother should have been asking your lawyer in march. Dig out the court papers, usually a minimum sentence is listed. He might have to be in for 4 years no matter what, it all depends on the court's ruling.

Sometimes they don't tell you shit though, when I was on probation, the court said I had to serve a minimum of 12 months, my probation ended in 6.

In the UK?

I'd be surprised if he does another 2 years if he behaves himself.

>>6057

>non-repetitive

what the fuck?

>>6067
Repeat offender.

>>6067
I couldn't remember the technical term

it's like, concomitant or something

usually you just can't get off probation until you do everything you're supposed to.

if you wait too long to do your service, the police will start harassing you for contempt of court and shit, but not paying your fines and not doing community service are usually unindictable crimes so you can't really get in trouble (might get a small fine or a night in jail)

Possible you might be prosecuted under Federal Analogue Law. Doubtful if you're caught with amounts not large enough to nail you with Intent to Distribute charges. I don't believe there have been any cases brought against individual users/purchasers.

What happens initially if they find it on you?

I have a P.O. box with USPS, and want to ship a number of glass pieces as well as a few orders of Phenazepam and various 2c's.

Nothing being sent to this box is strictly defined as illegal.

Can USPS make me open my packages when I go to pick them up? I know they can search through them with a federal search warrant. What happens if I refuse? Or if I open the box / package to reveal a small bag of fine whitish powder (which is unscheduled and being used for research purposes) or a shiny new Ehle?

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>6106

I've heard that they can search your packages without your consent though. And do they offer PO boxes?

>>6109
quit trolling

>>6069
private companies can search your shipments with no probable cause. Only the government is prohibited from unreasonable searches and seizures. Private parties are only barred from invasion of privacy, trespassing, breaking and entering, etc. By law, if you ship something by UPS, you have no legal expectation of privacy-they have a right to know what you are shipping (so they don't ship bombs or something illegal). The postal service is prohibited from searching your mail because they are agents of the government.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Go into the courtroom and punch the toughest motherfucker you see to establish dominance in there. It'll usually be the baliff.

>>6066
And then loudly yell "MORTAL KOMBAT!!!!!"

Wow, thanks guys. Can I have some serious responses now?

>>6102
You've already been charged. Unless they magically decide to tack on providing alcohol to minors or something like that. Just go in there and blame someone else or >>6066